- Let’s get back to Earth. Humans and animals feed on plants. The human body needs at least 60 minerals (such as Calcium, iron, magnesium…) This is not something their body can manufacture. Minerals must come from the soil. The plants use microorganisms in the soil to pre-digest the minerals. They need the plants to pre-cook their minerals before they can assimilate them. It was logical to decide that the plants must have been created before animals and humans. So far – so good.

- Where do the plants come from? They grow in a thin layer of arable earth spread around the planet. Without it, there would be no plants, no animals, and no humans.  The thin layer of arable land must have been created before the plants. That’s logical – Isn’t it?

​

Massimo Scaligero goes as far as saying that by the time the light of the sun hits the eyes it has lost most of its content. It has been reflected and is dead. We live in a dead world. There could be much more in the sun's light than we know. According to Scaligero we are surrounded by a world of which we know extraordinarily little. The light of our sun is the source of everything.  We are 90% blind. How can you explain color to somebody who is 90% color blind?

For more details read The light by Massimo Scaligero. (This is not the kind of literature you take to bed with crackers). If he is right, they may have to rediscover through their thinking what the primitive people who venerated the sun already knew through their intuition.

 

In case you like numbers, it is estimated that the earth has been receiving an "average over the entire earth" of 164 to 340 watts per square meter  every day.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight  This is much more than all the energy used every day, all over the Earth. This downpour of energy has been going on for millions of years. What happened to all that energy falling on the ground? We don't notice it because it is delivered in relatively small doses (compared to what the sun can do) but we cannot ignore its cumulative effect. The arable land could be produced by exposing the earth to the effect of the sun for millions of years. This exposure is still going on. There is more to come.

 

You could say that the arable earth, the plants, the animals, and humanity are an “implementation” of the light received from the sun over millions of years. We started with a piece of rock, six million years ago. Very slowly, the light from their sun transforms this rock and covers it with a thin layer of arable land. Under more sun, plants start growing, followed by animals and the human species.

 

That is only half the story. This is only the material aspect of their sun's influence. The immaterial side of the sun's light was also transforming the Earth. It created what they see today as heat, life, consciousness, love and all those things that are important in their life but don't have a shape or a weight. That cannot be proven, of course. This is not a domain where you can do experiments.

 

Let’s keep dreaming!

This idea fits very well with the Big Bang. The two opposites balance each other. The Big Bang uses a lot of energy but no time and no space. The exposure to the sun for millions of years uses only small doses of energy but needs a lot of time and a lot of space. Those two seem to be made for each other. We are part of that evolution. We are part of the creation of the world. We take part in the creation of the universe every day of our lives. Congratulations! Let’s keep going!

​

The problem with reverse engineering is that it is based on “time” alone. You cannot imagine that the stars were created in space, without moving, and time was added later to make them move. Look at the moon and try to imagine that it is not moving. What would happen?  Would it fall? What does that mean for the moon to fall?

 

Reverse engineering cannot go back more than a few million years. This is not much for a planet that is 13 billion years old.  Something is missing. By ‘creation of the world’, we mean the creation of the material world. Astronomers are now saying that the material world represents only 5% of creation. Our material world could be nothing more than the residues of the creation of dark matter.

​

​